He purchased and you may enhanced right here what turned into his household for the next twenty two decades and on this one most of the college students was in fact born but the 2 eldest. Inside the 1891 he offered which home and purchased part thirty-two within the block ten on the four miles northeast from Chillicothe, that he improved and remaining since a house-stead.
Pledged so you’re able to and you can registered in advance of myself, that it twenty-first day of Oct
Their Christian lifetime expanded using a period of more than forty years. The guy stored securely with the Ancient Baptist faith, which became his entire comfort inside the past weeks by both precepts and you may analogy the guy portrayed the highest style of an enthusiastic Western resident.
Mark MEEKS’ second relationship, to help you Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] was Sep 21, 1858 from inside the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. You’ll find nothing understood on a marriage in order to a beneficial COHEN besides the marriage licenses, recorded during the Marriage Guide step one, web page 914, ideas the marriage since the ranging from e, and you may Sarah made their unique mark. The marriage is actually performed from the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.
T. KERLEY
I, T. T. KERLEY, manage solemnly claim that i are 21 yrs . old, which Skip W. C. MEEKS are 18/7 years old, and this there are no court arguments to our Relationships. J. C. WELLS becoming pledged states https://kissbrides.com/sv/baltiska-kvinnor/ your moms and dads out-of Skip W. C. MEEKS has actually provided its full accept to the wedding of its daughter to Mr. T.
Sarah and Mark lived west of Haynesville when you look at the Claiborne Parish having sometime and had probably only one youngster, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the brand new spouse out-of T. The relatives records imply that Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY came to be November 31, 1865, from the Vow, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, additionally the grave marker implies a date off delivery off 1865. I would suggest, yet not, the day off beginning could have indeed become November 31, 1863 as opposed to one go out inside the 1865. Definitely, there’s no beginning certificate. This new dying certification is not any let, whilst suggests a night out together out-of birth off November 29, 1886, over five years adopting the day away from their own relationship. It does suggest an era during the loss of 52, and since the new dying taken place January 16, 1919, she would was indeed born in the 1866, making the 1886 more than likely an excellent typographical mistake. To get various beginning go out, I have around three objections:
- Brand new census taker-in 1870, functioning August 23, 1870, revealed that new child’s age is actually nine. While you are census takers are infamously bad on age, it is rather strange, In my opinion, for that more youthful a baby to possess a beginning big date one to miles away. It might simply be 36 months wrong into corrected go out instead of 5 years wrong to your 1965 time. The new 1880 census taker listed the age due to the fact 18, once again too-old to possess either go out and completely wrong as in advance of their own relationships, discussed lower than, when she wasn’t yet , 18.
- By far the most severe disagreement I’ve ‘s the relationship licenses, copied verbatim to your figure ?. There are two transform into posted means, the first being the criteria that the woman become at the least you are yrs old versus parental agree, and the second are the out-dated setting is actually printed to be used on first three digits of big date are “187”, which is entered abreast of tell you a date off Oct 21, 1881. Getting an excellent November 29th birthday and be seventeen, the year out of birth need to be 1863. When the she really was ten in place of in the 1 month timid off eighteen, perform this new clerk provides approved the expression of your own groom’s sibling that the bride’s moms and dads recognized the wedding?